On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 01:20:27PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> The version of mawk shipped with bullseye still has this bug (or what
> upstream calls a known limitation).
yes. I spent some time last year (July-October) working on mawk, and have most
of this feature implemented.
However, I
The version of mawk shipped with bullseye still has this bug (or what
upstream calls a known limitation).
I've also verified that the bug occurs with upstream mawk, version
1.3.4-20200120, both with and without the --without-builtin-regex
compile time option.
unicorn:~/tmp/mawk-1.3.4-20200120$
Hi,
Fabien COUTANT wrote:
I am talking about {m}/{m,}/{m,n} at the place where you use ?, *
or +.
The sample program:
BEGIN {
s=abacab
r1=(a[bc]){2,3}
r2=(a[bc])(a[bc])+
print s~r1, s~r2
}
should print 1 1 but it doesn't.
With Aleksey Cheusov’s
FC On Monday, 06 March 2006, you (Aleksey Cheusov) wrote:
Look at this patch
http://www.mova.org/~cheusov/pub/mawk_external_regexp.patch
It allows to link mawk with external regexp library.
0 ~mawk '/^a{3,5}$/'
aa
aaa
aaa
a
a
aa
0 ~
FC
FC Package: mawk
FC Version: 1.3.3-11
FC Severity: normal
FC mawk claims to comply with Posix 1003.2. I can't check it directly, but
FC checking instead SUSv2 (which I think equals Posix concerning Awk), it
FC mandates that regular expressions support the interval repetition count
FC
On Monday, 06 March 2006, you (Aleksey Cheusov) wrote:
Look at this patch
http://www.mova.org/~cheusov/pub/mawk_external_regexp.patch
It allows to link mawk with external regexp library.
0 ~mawk '/^a{3,5}$/'
aa
aaa
aaa
a
a
aa
0 ~
--
Best regards, Aleksey
Package: mawk
Version: 1.3.3-11
Severity: normal
mawk claims to comply with Posix 1003.2. I can't check it directly, but
checking instead SUSv2 (which I think equals Posix concerning Awk), it
mandates that regular expressions support the interval repetition count
feature. I am talking about
7 matches
Mail list logo
