On Friday 21 April 2006 11:36 pm, Frederik Schueler wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Could you test this patch for me?
I would like to, but the patch does not apply. Investigating by hand,
it seems the diff is against an even newer version than in
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:08:36PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
The second patch I sent has been reported to fail by other 64bit testers so
I've got - what I hope - is the proper solution and it's tested against the
original source.
it works now :-)
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
Package: qof
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
creating test-book-merge
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I. -I../ -I../../qof -I../../lib/libsql
-I.. -I../.. -I../../.. -I../../qof -I/usr/include/libxml2
Hi Frederick,
Could you test this patch for me?
I hope it's simply a typo in the selection of the unsigned macro instead of
the signed. I can then arrange to include the patch in a -2 upload.
Thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
Hi Frederick,
Try this one instead! (Oops, sent you a patch made against a local copy
instead of the released source.)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
--- qof-0.6.4/qof/test/test-date.c 2005-10-23
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Could you test this patch for me?
I would like to, but the patch does not apply. Investigating by hand,
it seems the diff is against an even newer version than in 0.6.4-1:
if (!ok || always_print)
{
fprintf (stderr,
6 matches
Mail list logo
