-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 365408 + wontfix
thanks
Hi
Based the latest entries and the latest update to the policy, I am marking
this as wontfix. That being said, I intend to propose the removal of the
java*-compiler packages.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:03:19PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
A function that is used to call a
Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MJ Ray a Âcrit :
[...]
A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
A function that is used to call a runtime,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MJ Ray a écrit :
[...]
A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
A function that is used to call a
A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
A function that is used to call a runtime, compiler, etc of the Java(tm)
language!
Java? is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cc'ing to debian-legal: summary:
The major question is about replacing java1-runtime, java1-compiler,
java2-runtime and java2-compiler virtual packages by classpath-jre,
classpath-jdk for free java implementation and java-jre and java-jdk for
non-free
Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The major question is about replacing java1-runtime, java1-compiler,
java2-runtime and java2-compiler virtual packages by classpath-jre,
classpath-jdk for free java implementation and java-jre and java-jdk for
non-free implementations. More informations on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Fry a écrit :
[...]
2) I don't see the trademark problem. There are already virtual
packages that use the word java. What would be the difference
between continuing the same trend?
There is a trademark problem. The java1|2
2) I don't see the trademark problem. There are already virtual
packages that use the word java. What would be the difference
between continuing the same trend?
There is a trademark problem. The java1|2 virtual packages were targeted
to Sun's, IBM's and Blackdown JVM version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Fry wrote:
Note that I added a paragraph from a proposal from Stefan Gybas,
modified by Ben Burton (see Bug#227587). Even if they did not really get
a consensus, I think, with the change of the virtual packages to
classpath-jre, classpath-jdk,
I strongly oppose the classpath/java distinction for classpath vs.
non-free JREs and JDKs. Instead I propose dropping classpath-* as well,
and only using java-jre and java-jdk.
So people that wants to use Java should install non-free software?
That's not possible in Debian!
No, I want
Note that I added a paragraph from a proposal from Stefan Gybas,
modified by Ben Burton (see Bug#227587). Even if they did not really get
a consensus, I think, with the change of the virtual packages to
classpath-jre, classpath-jdk, java-jre and java-jdk, the proposal of
Stefan is good to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
package: java-common
version: 0.24
Hi all,
One of the result of our discussions in Oldenburg (devjam) and in
Bruxelles (FOSDEM) is about the use of the virtual packages.
One of our reflexion was the number in the java*-runtime and
java*-compiler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
One of the result of our discussions in Oldenburg (devjam) and in
Bruxelles (FOSDEM) is about the use of the virtual packages.
I forgot to thanks Wolfgang Baer, Michael Koch, Matthias Klose, Stefan
Gybas, Ben Burton and
14 matches
Mail list logo
