Bug#375712: Corrected patch for acct monthly cron job

2006-11-01 Thread lll_deb
Le Thursday 05 October 2006 à 09:02:59 +0100, Nick Leverton a écrit: I believe the previous two patches are incorrect, because the fields in sort +n are numbered starting from zero, whereas sort -k n numbers the fields from 1. So sort +1 is equivalent to sort -k2. The attached patch to

Bug#375712: Corrected patch for acct monthly cron job

2006-10-05 Thread Nick Leverton
I believe the previous two patches are incorrect, because the fields in sort +n are numbered starting from zero, whereas sort -k n numbers the fields from 1. So sort +1 is equivalent to sort -k2. The attached patch to /etc/cron.monthly/acct allows for this difference, and prevents the monthly