Bug#383403: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:21:18AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:13:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:30:58AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:03:39AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:31:40PM

Bug#383403: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-17 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:33:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: But the maintainer does, and for a change this request doesn't conflict with the Social Contract. Why are we discussing on whether we prefer one bug or multiple bugs when we have actual SC violations right now that need fixing?

Bug#383403: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-16 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:03:39AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:31:40PM +0300, Markus Laire wrote: I'm not a maintainer, but I did have info that bug had not been dealt with, so I reopened the bug with that info. I see that you sent info, but only to the BTS