Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tested installing and removing texlive and some associated
packages, not including texlive-full.
The basics went without incident.
However, auctex suggests catdvi, and the latter depends on tetex-base
without texlive as an alternate.
The problem
Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: texlive
Version: 2005.dfsg.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi all,
after reading through the bug log and what you've found out so far, it
seems to me that there are a couple of issues:
The various tex's have a checkered history on this system. I think I
Hi all!
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
In the recent upgrade to KDE 3.5.4 kdegraphics seemed to require texlive
packages, but these failed with an error that a file was owned by two
packages, and that I should remove texlive. I attempted to do so.
1. Why does or did
I was finally able to clean up my system by using dpkg with
--force-remove-reinstreq to purge preview-latex-style. This did not
immediately work, because the package's postrm script attempts to
invoke mktexlsr (I think--this is from memory), which wasn't there. I
commented out the line, and was
Hi Ross!
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006, Ross Boylan wrote:
I was finally able to clean up my system by using dpkg with
Good to hear.
I then purged every package with texlive in the name (are there any
others I should zap?). I have not yet tried reinstalling; the mailing
No, all the packages have
Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because I've already purged the packages, I can't answer some of the
questions below. I have some comments below with more information; in
particular, see bug #385784 for a diagnosis and 2 possible solutions
to the apparent aptitude error (which was
I tested installing and removing texlive and some associated
packages, not including texlive-full.
The basics went without incident.
However, auctex suggests catdvi, and the latter depends on tetex-base
without texlive as an alternate.
The problem that caused me to file this report is solved
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:13:10PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Hi Ross,
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:25:53 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Yes, but as I showed in the subsequent message, I'm also unable to
purge the packages. Seems I can neither go forward or back.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:58:51
Hi Ross,
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:25:53 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Yes, but as I showed in the subsequent message, I'm also unable to
purge the packages. Seems I can neither go forward or back.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:58:51 -0700, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removing dvipdfmx ...
Package: texlive
Version: 2005.dfsg.1-1
Severity: normal
Warrants higher severity if I have not put my system into some
idiosyncratic, oddball state.
I think there's some kind of circular dependency among the the texlive
packages; I'm too sleepy to get to the bottom of it.
The various tex's
Dear Ross!
Did you see this:
On Son, 27 Aug 2006, Ross Boylan wrote:
corn:~# date; aptitude -q install texlive-base
...
Unpacking texlive-doc-base (from .../texlive-doc-base_2005-2_all.deb) ...
Upgrade from experimental versions are not supported!
Please purge all texlive packages before
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:43:02PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Dear Ross!
Did you see this:
On Son, 27 Aug 2006, Ross Boylan wrote:
corn:~# date; aptitude -q install texlive-base
...
Unpacking texlive-doc-base (from .../texlive-doc-base_2005-2_all.deb) ...
Upgrade from
12 matches
Mail list logo
