On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 at 08:43:13 +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
disc-cover depends on tetex-base, tetex-bin and tetex-extra, which are
going away.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:15:17PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
So the minimal dependencies would be:
tetex-bin | texlive-base-bin
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:47:15AM +0100, raphael daum wrote:
could you please fix the dependency-problem of disc-cover with texlive.
its just about changing a single line.
I will try and get this done today.
--
Jereme Corrado [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
dear jereme corrado,
could you please fix the dependency-problem of disc-cover with texlive.
its just about changing a single line.
would make (at least) me happy, since rebuilding the package locally is
not really the debian way of package-management.
TIA
raphael daum
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: disc-cover
Version: 1.5.4-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I'm currently migrating from tetex to texlive and I had to uninstall
disc-cover as it depends on tetex-bin, tetex-base and tetex-extra.
So I tried to rebuild the package doing the following:
- I dropped the tetex-bin and tetex-base
On Die, 29 Aug 2006, Yannick Roehlly wrote:
So I tried to rebuild the package doing the following:
- I dropped the tetex-bin and tetex-base dependencies as tetex-extra
brings them.
- I changed the tetex-extra dependency for
tetex-extra | texlive-latex-extra.
With theses changes,
Hi Yannick,
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:24:29PM +0200, Yannick Roehlly wrote:
I'm currently migrating from tetex to texlive and I had to uninstall
disc-cover as it depends on tetex-bin, tetex-base and tetex-extra.
Thanks for looking for new min dependencies, and good thinking
bringing the tex
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:15:17PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Die, 29 Aug 2006, Yannick Roehlly wrote:
I don't know if texlive-latex-extra is the correct minimal dependency,
that's why I cced the bug to the debian tex maintainers list (if I
was wrong doing this I apology).
With
7 matches
Mail list logo
