Bug#400092: dpatch: [dpatch.lib.sh] DPATCH_LIB_NO_DEFAULT is not documented in dpatch(1)

2011-08-14 Thread Gergely Nagy
tags 400092 + wontfix thanks After thinking about this overnight, I wonder: what's the use? Yes, the documentation could be better, but would anyone read it? I doubt so, as new packages use 3.0 source formats, and don't touch dpatch. Old ones probably don't care about these details anymore. I do

Bug#400092: dpatch: [dpatch.lib.sh] DPATCH_LIB_NO_DEFAULT is not documented in dpatch(1)

2011-08-13 Thread Gergely Nagy
Thanks for catching this! Actually, none of the dpatch-run stuff (dpatch.lib.sh being part of that stuff) is documented anywhere. I'll write a section about dpatch-run friends to the manual page, probably based on the debian/NEWS entry that mentions dpatch-run and DPATCH_LIB_NO_DEFAULT. --

Bug#400092: dpatch: [dpatch.lib.sh] DPATCH_LIB_NO_DEFAULT is not documented in dpatch(1) manual

2006-11-23 Thread Jari Aalto
Package: dpatch Version: 2.0.21 Severity: normal In dpatch.lib.sh there is line: if test x${DPATCH_LIB_NO_DEFAULT} = x; then However this global variable is not documented in dpatch(1) manual. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,