again, the point is that broken partial upgrade are not possible anymore
due to the tighter depends[0]; you have to upgrade all ncurses packages
in the same run.
or more informal:
as soon as you get 'new' ncurses package, any other inter-ncurses
depends is on = 5.6+200701013-1 (or =
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:41:01AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
again, the point is that broken partial upgrade are not possible anymore
due to the tighter depends[0]; you have to upgrade all ncurses packages
in the same run.
or more informal:
as soon as you get 'new' ncurses package, any
Justin Pryzby wrote:
Are you sure?
yes.
Something needs to prevent a stable system from upgrading libncurses
before ncurses-bin.
doesn't matter. the only thing that matters is, that if you do an
upgrade from etch to sid, all ncurses packages are updated and each of
the new ones depends on
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:05:53AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Justin Pryzby wrote:
I think that should be declared, right?
yep, sorry about that, and thanks for finding that bug.
Partial upgrades are
supposed to be supported. At least shouldn't the it be declared as
a conflicts?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:08:03PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Justin Pryzby wrote:
Are you sure?
yes.
Something needs to prevent a stable system from upgrading libncurses
before ncurses-bin.
doesn't matter. the only thing that matters is, that if you do an
upgrade from etch to
Justin Pryzby wrote:
I think that should be declared, right?
yep, sorry about that, and thanks for finding that bug.
Partial upgrades are
supposed to be supported. At least shouldn't the it be declared as
a conflicts?
i think, a tighter versioned depends is enough (which i've just uploaded
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:21:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the ncurses-bin package:
#446929: ncurses-bin: references hidden symbols (?)
It has been closed by Daniel Baumann [EMAIL
7 matches
Mail list logo
