On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:53:33AM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Modestas Vainius schrieb:
Hi,
2007 m. December 1 d., Saturday, Patrick Matthäi raše.:
I will try to publish as fast as possible for me and the QA every new
upstream version, so that the package is actual.
Are you
Michael Mende schrieb:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:53:33AM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Modestas Vainius schrieb:
Hi,
2007 m. December 1 d., Saturday, Patrick Matthäi raše.:
I will try to publish as fast as possible for me and the QA every new
upstream version, so that the
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:21:24PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
[...]
Hello,
yes I've reviewed the old 1.3.x version and the actual 1.4.3-1.
In a few .c files at the librarys source code I've found for Debian
illegal copyright statements.
In the 1.4.3 release, it is only available in
Modestas Vainius schrieb:
Hi,
2007 m. December 1 d., Saturday, Patrick Matthäi raše.:
I will try to publish as fast as possible for me and the QA every new
upstream version, so that the package is actual.
Are you aware of the non-freeness issues with geoip.dat license[1]? This
Hi,
2007 m. December 1 d., Saturday, Patrick Matthäi rašė:
I will try to publish as fast as possible for me and the QA every new
upstream version, so that the package is actual.
Are you aware of the non-freeness issues with geoip.dat license[1]? This
warrants a serious bug, yet I'm not opening
Package: libgeoip1
Version: 1.3.17-1.1
Hi,
I've seen that the /usr/share/GeoIP/GeoIP.dat file belongs to the libgeoip1
package and thus gets rarely updated. I would suggest splitting this package
into libgeoip1 and libgeoip1-data (or similar, architecture-independent
package) and updating the
Hello,
first, thanks for your report.
I think you dismissed something in your report.
If I would split the the geoip.dat in a new package, it wouldn't change
anything. Because the source package of it would be the same and I've to
update all geopip packages.
Please note, that the last
7 matches
Mail list logo
