Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd wrote:
CCT Now for cyrus 2.3.
CCT What's the status
I've created a proposed 2.3.13 branch - see
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel/2009-February/002609.html
and replies - and am trying to make time to clean/post/commit
P.S.: I am happy running cyrus-imapd 2.2, so there is no strong push
to invest time into packaging 2.3 before lenny is out (or arguing on
this
list whether somebody agree or disagree). But I am willing to support
others work.
Lenny is out! Yaay!!!
Now for cyrus 2.3.
What's the status and
Wed, 2008-12-17 at 20:37 +0100, =?UTF-8?Q? Ond=C5=99ej_?=
=?UTF-8?Q?Sur=C3=BD ?= wrote:
What help would the Debian Cyrus Team most appreciate?
I cannot speak for others, but I see no sense to package cyrus-imapd
2.3 right now,
it will not get into next stable, so sensible approach is to
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd wrote:
DG What help would the Debian Cyrus Team most appreciate?
[I deliberately didn't copy my original message to the bug address,
since it was a rather general discussion. But others have, so browsers
of the bugs database may wish to read
Hi Duncan,
2.3.8 is already in experimental, but incase's cyrus23 SVN branch hasn't
been touched for a year. I'm guessing from the tiny volume of traffic
on the coordination list, and the quietness of the SVN repo that the
team don't have time to update to 2.3.13. We've already done that,
What help would the Debian Cyrus Team most appreciate?
I cannot speak for others, but I see no sense to package cyrus-imapd
2.3 right now,
it will not get into next stable, so sensible approach is to wait for
lenny to release
and after that move cyrus-imapd-2.3 to unstable, prepare way how to
Hi,
I am keen to implement a server with the new replication features, so
I'd like to help move this along.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
7 matches
Mail list logo
