Hi Vincent
I have not looked into the problem more. However I will try to find some
time later this or next week.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:32:53PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 27 mars 2008, vers 00:41, je disais:
Please note that
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 27 mars 2008, vers 00:41, je disais:
Please note that I have done the following to make it actually start sessvc.
scp sesman/sessvc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
That's odd because you should not have to (because of patch 08). I have
uploaded a new version of
Hi Vincent
I'm not fully sure but I think your patch was broken...
applying patch 09sesman_sig_handling to ./ ...patch: malformed patch at
line 22: + LOG_DBG(g_waitchild() [%d] No more children, g_getpid())
failed.
make: *** [patch-stamp] Fel 1
I applied it manually and also added a
Hi Vincent
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:39:39PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du samedi 22 mars 2008, vers 16:32, Ola
Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
With the -DDEBUG and 08 and 09 patch sesman crashes. So I tried once
without any
extra patches. Just
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du samedi 22 mars 2008, vers 16:32, Ola
Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
With the -DDEBUG and 08 and 09 patch sesman crashes. So I tried once without
any
extra patches. Just the -DDEBUG added.
[...]
And with the 09 patch I get the following (with -DDEBUG):
Hi Vincent
Here we go.
Startup:
[20080326-21:10:13] [INFO ] starting signal handling thread...
[20080326-21:10:13] [INFO ] signal handler thread started successfully
[20080326-21:10:13] [CORE ] starting sesman with pid 14340
[20080326-21:10:13] [INFO ] listening...
[20080326-21:10:13] [DEBUG]
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 26 mars 2008, vers 21:00, Ola
Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Hi Vincent
I'm not fully sure but I think your patch was broken...
applying patch 09sesman_sig_handling to ./ ...patch: malformed patch at
line 22: + LOG_DBG(g_waitchild() [%d]
No problem. Now I have learnt more about dpatch. :)
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:12:36PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 26 mars 2008, vers 21:00, Ola
Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Hi Vincent
I'm not fully sure but I think
Alle mercoledì 26 marzo 2008, Ola Lundqvist ha scritto:
[cut]
[20080326-21:11:21] [DEBUG] pass file: /home/test/.vnc/sesman_passwd
[20080326-21:11:21] [INFO ] starting sessvc - xpid=14348 - wmpid=14347
Logout
nothing
as logout you mean closing the session, not only closing rdesktop window,
Hi Simone
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:01:36PM +0100, Simone Fedele wrote:
Alle mercoledì 26 marzo 2008, Ola Lundqvist ha scritto:
[cut]
[20080326-21:11:21] [DEBUG] pass file: /home/test/.vnc/sesman_passwd
[20080326-21:11:21] [INFO ] starting sessvc - xpid=14348 - wmpid=14347
Logout
Alle mercoledì 26 marzo 2008, Ola Lundqvist ha scritto:
at this time a ps should list no sessvc processes and obviously no
Xvnc/X11rdp nor the wm.
if your situation is like this, there's some problem with signals
(read: sessvc dies but sesman can't get his SIGCHLD).
what does ps say?
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 26 mars 2008, vers 21:14, Ola
Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Please note that I have done the following to make it actually start sessvc.
scp sesman/sessvc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
That's odd because you should not have to (because of patch 08). I
Hi Vincent
With the -DDEBUG and 08 and 09 patch sesman crashes. So I tried once without any
extra patches. Just the -DDEBUG added.
First on startup.
[20080322-13:06:36] [CORE ] starting sesman with pid 23288
[20080322-13:06:36] [INFO ] listening...
[20080322-13:06:36] [DEBUG] calling sigwait()
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 07 mars 2008, vers 00:57, je
disais:
Could you change
CFLAGS = -Wall -O2 -I../common -I/usr/include/nptl -I./libscp $(DEFINES)
to
CFLAGS = -DDEBUG -Wall -O2 -I../common -I/usr/include/nptl -I./libscp
$(DEFINES)
in sesman/Makefile and
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du dimanche 16 mars 2008, vers
11:19, je disais:
Did you manage to get a trace with DEBUG?
In the meantime, could you try this patch? Put in debian/patches and add
its name in debian/patches/00list (without the extension). I think it
could fix the
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 03 mars 2008, vers 22:20, Ola
Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
This is the procedure:
* Install package (and start service)
* Install gnome
* Login using rdesktop and the sesman-Xvnc function.
* A gnome desktop is shown
* Logout from the gnome
OoO En ce début de soirée du jeudi 06 mars 2008, vers 21:39, je disais:
This is the procedure:
* Install package (and start service)
* Install gnome
* Login using rdesktop and the sesman-Xvnc function.
* A gnome desktop is shown
* Logout from the gnome desktop using the logout function
OoO En ce début de soirée du jeudi 06 mars 2008, vers 21:50, je disais:
Maybe sessvc can help here. I don't really understand what it is
for. There is the same code in sesman.c. Jay, any hint?
Hey Ola !
May you try this patch? You can then compile again the package (with
Hi Vincent
Thanks a lot for your help. It did unfortunatly not work.
This is how it looks like before logged in:
[20080306-22:38:38] [INFO ] starting signal handling thread...
[20080306-22:38:38] [INFO ] signal handler thread started successfully
[20080306-22:38:38] [CORE ] starting sesman with
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du jeudi 06 mars 2008, vers 22:33, Ola
Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Hi Vincent
Thanks a lot for your help. It did unfortunatly not work.
Could you change
CFLAGS = -Wall -O2 -I../common -I/usr/include/nptl -I./libscp $(DEFINES)
to
CFLAGS = -DDEBUG
Package: xrdp
Version: 0.4.0~dfsg-4
Severity: normal
Hi
Thanks a lot for packaging this. It saves me a lot of time. :)
As you probably know I spent some time in vain.
In any case I would like to report a bug that I have discovered.
This is the procedure:
* Install package (and start service)
*
21 matches
Mail list logo
