On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:05:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 12:19 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 15:41 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Please report this upstream at https://bugzilla.kernel.org under
product 'Power Management, component
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 14:42 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:05:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 12:19 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 15:41 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Please report this upstream at
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 12:19 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 15:41 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Please report this upstream at https://bugzilla.kernel.org under
product 'Power Management, component 'cpufreq'. Let us know the bug
number so that we can track it.
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 10:11 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
Okay, I can't get reportbug to work properly at the moment, it fails to
reach BTS for linux-2.6
In any case, here is the details I have now:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32+25
Severity: normal
Running
Ok, its better. I now get 1.6GHz on this same machine, without the
battery in the battery slot.
But now with the latest kernel, even on AC power, with the battery in
place, cpufreqd will never ever go above 1.6GHz. I can select the
frequency or profile and I see the clock speed change for about
Okay, I can't get reportbug to work properly at the moment, it fails to
reach BTS for linux-2.6
In any case, here is the details I have now:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32+25
Severity: normal
Running linux-image-2.6.32-3-686-bigmem 2.6.32-9, this problem is better
without a battery in the
Hi,
I apologize for my previous post. Based on this post:
http://en.community.dell.com/forums/p/7590995/7816851.aspx, I'm (again)
almost certain that this issue is related to a laptop's manufacturer
trick to prevent damage to their components from excess heat (think of
warranty); (maybe
Hi there,
This bug has been present for a long time, but now (with the latest
kernel) it seems worst.
I'm currently running 2.6.32-3-686-bigmem in a Squeeze/Sid mix. This is
a Latitude E6400 with battery and 90watt adapter; in my case, I have
never removed the battery.
For the last couple
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:59:56PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 00:27 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:43:59PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 23:58 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
reassign 470474 linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:43:59PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 23:58 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
reassign 470474 linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
thanks
I assume you are using the Debian kernel packages right?
Anyway this is a kernel bug, not cpufrqutils. ;)
Yes 100%
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 00:27 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:43:59PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 23:58 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
reassign 470474 linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
thanks
I assume you are using the Debian kernel packages
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 002-7.2
Severity: normal
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
Lenovo T61 6465CTO with 4GB of memory, running a 32-bit kernel, for
various reasons.
With a Battery in the battery bay I get full use of ondemand or any
other govenor. All avaialable
reassign 470474 linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
thanks
I assume you are using the Debian kernel packages right?
Anyway this is a kernel bug, not cpufrqutils. ;)
cheers
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:56:50AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 002-7.2
Severity: normal
Intel(R)
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 23:58 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
reassign 470474 linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
thanks
I assume you are using the Debian kernel packages right?
Anyway this is a kernel bug, not cpufrqutils. ;)
Yes 100% Debian.
Well barring Christian's stuff from debian-multimedia.
14 matches
Mail list logo
