Hi,
You can clone the current tree from:
git clone git://git.debian.org/git/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs.git
After you commit changes with git commit, 'git format-patch origin -o
some-directory/' will create Git patches (formatted as email) to send
to me via email which I can apply to my
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:30:18 -0700 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
Hi Junichi,
I obviously do not have enough time to test this patch and maintain
it. Are you interested in maintaining apt-listbugs (in co-maintenance
mode probably?)
Thank you very much for the offer.
I am interested in
Hi,
I obviously do not have enough time to test this patch and maintain
it. Are you interested in maintaining apt-listbugs (in co-maintenance
mode probably?)
At Tue, 2 Sep 2008 00:18:25 +0200,
Francesco Poli wrote:
diff -ruN c/aptcleanup g/aptcleanup
--- c/aptcleanup 2008-05-13
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:12:17 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
The attached patch modifies /usr/share/apt-listbugs/aptcleanup in order
to let it behave as I previously explained.
The attached patch is an updated version.
I added a little check, since I found out that a pinned package could
be
tag 473175 patch
thanks
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:55:12 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:27:58 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
[...]
Your logic sounds reasonable, patch is welcome. It's going to be a
major rewrite since aptcleanup currently is a very simple script.
I have to
Hi,
Again assuming that the above is correct, I don't think that this logic
is appropriate for aptcleanup. That is to say, I don't think that
waiting for the pinned package to be non-RC-buggy before unpinning it
is the right thing to do.
The reason is: when I ask apt-listbugs to pin a
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:27:58 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
Hi! :)
Again assuming that the above is correct, I don't think that this logic
is appropriate for aptcleanup.
[...]
I think the design of aptcleanup could be changed as follows.
[...]
1.2.1) query the BTS about the
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:18:44 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Why do I get different results from the ones you get?!?
Why?!?
What's wrong with my system?
I performed some other checks in order to understand what's going on.
I think I found what's wrong with aptcleanup.
IIUC, aptcleanup
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:27:28 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
IIUC, aptcleanup parses /etc/apt/preferences and creates a list of
pinned packages.
Then aptcleanup queries the BTS (by invoking apt-listbugs on the list of
pinned packages) in order to see whether the currently pinned packages
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:58:08 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
[...]
I've ran it with your data, and does the expected stuff. apt bug
isn't fixed yet, fontconfig bug is now fixed. Apparently
'Explanation' isn't edited by aptcleanup (it can be edited by user),
so although only a part of the
Hi,
The system executes cron.daily scripts via anacron everyday, but nothing
seems to change in this file.
However:
* #454965 and #452718 were merged together and then downgraded from
severity `serious' to `important' (on Sun, 23 Mar 2008)
* fontconfig (version 2.5.0-2,
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.86
Severity: important
Hi and thanks for maintaining apt-listbugs!
I am experiencing a problem with its cron.daily script, though.
Some time ago, I pinned two packages in order to avoid installing
versions affected by a couple of bugs which I thought could have
12 matches
Mail list logo
