Bug#476846: Bug does NOT happen for sid version (9:1.1.7.1-1) of genisoimage on armel

2008-04-21 Thread Martin Guy
Maybe this is support for the explanation as an endian problem? arm and armel are little-endian. The main weirdnesses of plain arm are a bizarre middle-endian floating point format (look for things trying to read FP values off a disk file or network stream) and unusual structure-packing

Bug#476846: Bug does NOT happen for sid version (9:1.1.7.1-1) of genisoimage on armel

2008-04-20 Thread Barry Tennison
Package: genisoimage Version: 9:1.1.7.1-1 Severity: important Thanks again to Martin Guy, I can confirm that the buggy behaviour does NOT happen for genisoimage version 1.1.7.1-1 (sid current) on armel. Instead, the behaviour is just as on i386 and amd64: the RR signatures are detected and

Bug#476846: Bug does NOT happen for sid version (9:1.1.7.1-1) of genisoimage on armel

2008-04-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Barry Tennison] Thanks again to Martin Guy, I can confirm that the buggy behaviour does NOT happen for genisoimage version 1.1.7.1-1 (sid current) on armel. Instead, the behaviour is just as on i386 and amd64: the RR signatures are detected and the iso successfully updated. Maybe this

Bug#476846: Bug does NOT happen for sid version (9:1.1.7.1-1) of genisoimage on armel

2008-04-20 Thread Tobias Frost
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 10:24 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: No, it's not an endian problem. i386, amd64, arm, and armel are _all_ little-endian. MMmmh, I always thought arm and armel differs in endianess... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#476846: Bug does NOT happen for sid version (9:1.1.7.1-1) of genisoimage on armel

2008-04-20 Thread Tim Small
Tobias Frost wrote: On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 10:24 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: No, it's not an endian problem. i386, amd64, arm, and armel are _all_ little-endian. MMmmh, I always thought arm and armel differs in endianess... Nope, some packing, and syscall, and FP differences.