Bug#478915: RM: libxmlrpc3-java/testing [alpha hppa] -- RoM

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote: Le jeudi 01 mai 2008 à 20:10 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit : thanks for filing these, but I do think all of them should be *unstable* removals. If you have more of them, could you file them without the /testing, please?

Bug#478915: RM: libxmlrpc3-java/testing [alpha hppa] -- RoM

Hello, Selon Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The old binaries from previous versions stay in unstable. So yes, you're wrong and they should be removed from unstable. Thanks to you and to Thomas for correcting this mistake. I've retitled the RM bugs. Regards, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#478915: RM: libxmlrpc3-java/testing [alpha hppa] -- RoM

Hi Thomas, thanks for filing these, but I do think all of them should be *unstable* removals. If you have more of them, could you file them without the /testing, please? (And if you are bored, retitle the existing ones...) Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/

Bug#478915: RM: libxmlrpc3-java/testing [alpha hppa] -- RoM

Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove the architecture dependent binaries built from libxmlrpc3-java for the alpha and hppa architectures. They will not be built anymore because default-jdk-builddep is not available on theses arches. Thanks Regards, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#478915: RM: libxmlrpc3-java/testing [alpha hppa] -- RoM

Hello Thomas, Le jeudi 01 mai 2008 à 20:10 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit : thanks for filing these, but I do think all of them should be *unstable* removals. If you have more of them, could you file them without the /testing, please? (And if you are bored, retitle the existing ones...) I