On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ansgar Burchardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there is a contradiction how to name man pages for perl modules.
Section 4.1 states
Module packages must install manual pages into the standard
directories (see
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure, however, that the .1p recommendation is followed. Perl
folks, could you check? Is that really current policy and are we
following it?
It seems that we're almost OK there, sorry for the ugly oneliner:
$
\Martín Ferrari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure, however, that the .1p recommendation is followed. Perl
folks, could you check? Is that really current policy and are we
following it?
It seems that we're almost OK
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do people feel like that policy is correct and the programs that aren't
following it are just bugs? (Except for dh-make-perl and other things
that aren't modules.)
Seems so, although doesn't seem like very important bugs.
Ansgar Burchardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.3.0
Severity: normal
there is a contradiction how to name man pages for perl modules.
Section 4.1 states
Module packages must install manual pages into the standard
directories (see Documentation,
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.3.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
there is a contradiction how to name man pages for perl modules.
Section 4.1 states
Module packages must install manual pages into the standard
directories (see Documentation, Section 2.4) using the extensions
.1p and .3pm
6 matches
Mail list logo
