Hi.
I've had a look at the package sources, and
interdiff -z twiki_4.1.2-3.2.diff.gz twiki_4.1.2-4.diff.gz show at least
one problem with the reintroduction of obsolete br.po translation file,
which was removed in -3.2 (see changelog).
I'll try and test it.
Still I have one doubt about the
Le vendredi 15 août 2008 à 08:10 +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit :
Still I have one doubt about the change for
$TWiki::cfg{RCS}{WorkAreaDir} and $TWiki::cfg{TempfileDir}
in case of upgrades...
Will try and report for my upgrade tests.
OK, upgrades from -3.2 to -4 seem fine in this respect.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ardo, Christian ..
I've just put an updated version of the twiki package at
http://distributedinformation.com/TWikiDebian/
that fixes both the security flaw Dmitry found, and a few other bad
oddities.
Could one of you by any chance take a look at
Hi.
Haven't had a chance to look at the updated package yet (will try
today), but I think it may be better to acknowledge previous NMUs
explicitely in the changelog.
Hope this helps,
Best regards,
Le jeudi 14 août 2008 à 19:03 +1000, Sven Dowideit a écrit :
Ardo, Christian ..
I've just
Quoting Sven Dowideit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I really dunno.
I recal having an explicit ack to the NMU's a few years ago, and being
told to remove it.
The longer I do this debian stuff, the more I wish lintian were more
helpful, and more retentive.
IF is it policy to ack MNU's in the
I really dunno.
I recal having an explicit ack to the NMU's a few years ago, and being
told to remove it.
The longer I do this debian stuff, the more I wish lintian were more
helpful, and more retentive.
IF is it policy to ack MNU's in the next changelog, lintian should
probly complain bitterly
Le jeudi 14 août 2008 à 08:37 -0300, Christian Perrier a écrit :
Quoting Sven Dowideit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I really dunno.
I recal having an explicit ack to the NMU's a few years ago, and being
told to remove it.
The longer I do this debian stuff, the more I wish lintian were more
7 matches
Mail list logo
