Bug#504285: libao-pulse: should this package be removed (at least from testing?)

2008-11-03 Thread CJ van den Berg
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:41:50AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: Ok, good, I'll remove the package from testing then. Regarding closing the bug, it should not be closed as long as libao-pulse is in unstable, to prevent it from migrating to testing again. If, as you say, you don't expect

Bug#504285: libao-pulse: should this package be removed (at least from testing?)

2008-11-03 Thread Adeodato Simó
severity 504285 normal retitle 504285 RM: libao-pulse -- RoM; integrated into libao2 reassign 504285 ftp.debian.org thanks * CJ van den Berg [Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:52:33 +0100]: On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:41:50AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: Ok, good, I'll remove the package from testing then.

Bug#504285: libao-pulse: should this package be removed (at least from testing?)

2008-11-03 Thread Adeodato Simó
* CJ van den Berg [Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:00:01 +0100]: Hello, thanks for the reply. On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: I won't insist that this package should be removed from unstable, because maybe development on it starts again -- should that happen, then we

Bug#504285: libao-pulse: should this package be removed (at least from testing?)

2008-11-02 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: libao-pulse Version: 0.9.3-1 Severity: serious Hello, CJ. I have in my inbox a mail exchange with you from May 2007 in which I proposed to remove this package because libao2 had started providing the libao-pulse plugin. You commented that you didn't think it was a good idea, because

Bug#504285: libao-pulse: should this package be removed (at least from testing?)

2008-11-02 Thread CJ van den Berg
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: I won't insist that this package should be removed from unstable, because maybe development on it starts again -- should that happen, then we can stop shipping libao-pulse in libao2, and Suggest/Recommend libao-pulse instead.