Bug#508546: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#508546: unecessary bashism

2009-08-17 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 06:17:31PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote: i'm just noting that logcheck can run on any posix-compatible shell by simply changing one bashism. One bashism does not justity the need of the whole bash. That's not a bad point; I've therefore just removed the three (useless)

Bug#508546: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#508546: unecessary bashism

2008-12-12 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
tags 508546 - patch tags 508546 + moreinfo severity 508546 wishlist Am Freitag, den 12.12.2008, 11:25 +0100 schrieb Yuri D'Elia: Package: logcheck Severity: important Tags: patch /usr/sbin/logcheck depends on bash to work due to a single bashism in line 25: if [ $UID == 0 ]; then

Bug#508546: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#508546: unecessary bashism

2008-12-12 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Friday 12 December 2008 17:27:50 Gerfried Fuchs wrote: What would be the real gain of it? Because actually, I don't really see it. Especially, what's the deal with calling this severity important? If anything it is wishlist, not? Can you please explain what does upset you so much about