Bug#521746: eagle: FTBFS bug not fixed yet re: libxrender.so.1 and amd64 [fix attached]

2009-11-10 Thread Scott Howard
As the package currently is made, the warning is the same as the original reporter's comment: dh_shlibdeps -a dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libXrender.so.1 needed by debian/eagle/usr/lib/eagle/bin/eagle I tried putting ia32-libs-dev into the Build-Depends, and pbuilder

Bug#521746: Info received (Bug#521746: eagle: FTBFS bug not fixed yet re: libxrender.so.1 and amd64 [fix attached])

2009-11-10 Thread Scott Howard
Sorry for the extra email, but just to be clear: with ia32-libs [amd64] in Build-Depends, the package builds, installs, and runs properly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#521746: eagle: FTBFS bug not fixed yet re: libxrender.so.1 and amd64 [fix attached]

2009-11-10 Thread Shaun Jackman
It sounds like the solution is to move ia32-libs to Build-Depends then. I'll do that. I'll also e-mail the maintainer of ia32-libs and see whether he agrees. Thanks for the bug report and solution, Scott. Cheers, Shaun -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#521746: eagle: FTBFS bug not fixed yet re: libxrender.so.1 and amd64 [fix attached]

2009-11-09 Thread Shaun Jackman
Bug #360358 asked me to replace the ia32-libs-dev in Build-Depends with libc6-dev-i386, which is the current state: http://bugs.debian.org/360358 This page says that ia32-libs-dev only exists on ia64 (not amd64): http://packages.debian.org/sid/ia32-libs-dev Though ia32-libs is available on

Bug#521746: eagle: FTBFS bug not fixed yet re: libxrender.so.1 and amd64 [fix attached]

2009-11-08 Thread Scott Howard
Package: eagle Version: 5.6.0-3 Severity: normal The bug still exists in 5.6.0-3 ia32-libs [amd64] should be in Build-Depends not eagle binary package Depends This fixes the FTBFS and should allow this package to migrate into testing. ia32-libs is large and obnoxious, but I think this is the