Bug#527840: Needs to be actively maintained or removed

2009-12-03 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there, Hamish Co. On Jul 29 2009, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:13:39PM -1000, Ryo Furue wrote: Hi Moritz, | xpdf is a dead end. | I'm sorry to hear that. (No, it's not possible for me to take care of the package, unfortunately.) That's Moritz's

Bug#527840: Needs to be actively maintained or removed

2009-12-03 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:39:38AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: Hi there, Hamish Co. On Jul 29 2009, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:13:39PM -1000, Ryo Furue wrote: Hi Moritz, | xpdf is a dead end. | I'm sorry to hear that. (No, it's not possible for me

Bug#527840: Needs to be actively maintained or removed

2009-12-03 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:29:50PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: The only really supportable way would be to hack xpdf to link against poppler, maintaining a separate copy needs to stop for Squeeze. I agree in the context of the current maintenance of the Xpdf package, but if Xpdf was fully

Bug#527840: Needs to be actively maintained or removed

2009-07-28 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:18:44PM -1000, Ryo Furue wrote: Hi (An cleanest solution might be to drop xpdf altogether; the correct way to implement a PDF viewer these days is to build on top of poppler, such a okular, evince or epdfview. xpdf has been the only PDF viewer that is light

Bug#527840: Needs to be actively maintained or removed

2009-07-28 Thread Ryo Furue
Hi Moritz, Thanks for the suggestion. | (*)I log in to my workstation at my workplace from home | and invoke xpdf: For example, | |home$ ssh -X work.example.com |. . . log in to work . . . |work$ xpdf mydoc.pdf |work$ | | okular and acroread are so slow that it's utterly

Bug#527840: Needs to be actively maintained or removed

2009-07-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:13:39PM -1000, Ryo Furue wrote: Hi Moritz, | xpdf is a dead end. | I'm sorry to hear that. (No, it's not possible for me to take care of the package, unfortunately.) That's Moritz's observation/opinion rather than Xpdf's author's. It's certainly a long time

Bug#527840: Needs to be actively maintained or removed

2009-07-23 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:18:44PM -1000, Ryo Furue wrote: Hi (An cleanest solution might be to drop xpdf altogether; the correct way to implement a PDF viewer these days is to build on top of poppler, such a okular, evince or epdfview. xpdf has been the only PDF viewer that is light

Bug#527840: Needs to be actively maintained or removed

2009-07-23 Thread Ryo Furue
Hi (An cleanest solution might be to drop xpdf altogether; the correct way to implement a PDF viewer these days is to build on top of poppler, such a okular, evince or epdfview. xpdf has been the only PDF viewer that is light enough to be usable remotely(*). I wish it's maintained rather

Bug#527840: Needs to be actively maintained or removed

2009-05-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: xpdf Severity: serious xpdf has seen it's last maintainer upload two years ago. A package like xpdf with a long-standing track record of security issues needs an active maintainer. (An cleanest solution might be to drop xpdf altogether; the correct way to implement a PDF viewer these