Bug#540406: the wxt driver deserves its own package

Package: gnuplot Version: 4.6.5-4 Followup-For: Bug #540406 Dear Maintainer, also in light of #750045 having the wxt driver in a gnuplot-wxt package is indeed a good idea. Please consider this if/when the wxt driver is working again. Thanks, Antonio -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#540406: the wxt driver deserves its own package

Ivan Shmakov oneing...@gmail.com writes: Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com writes: 2012/7/1 Ivan Shmakov oneing...@gmail.com: Isn't it possible to build a single /usr/bin/gnuplot binary with all the relevant support for all the graphical interactive terminals supported by Debian, and

Bug#540406: the wxt driver deserves its own package

Hi Ivan, thanks for contribution! I have committed your changes to a separate branch of gnuplot git-repo [1]. Feel free to send patches in git-format. Your changes need to be precisely tested before merging and uploading. I will unlikely do a new upload before release, if no RC-bugs appear.

Bug#540406: the wxt driver deserves its own package

Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com writes: 2012/7/1 Ivan Shmakov oneing...@gmail.com: Isn't it possible to build a single /usr/bin/gnuplot binary with all the relevant support for all the graphical interactive terminals supported by Debian, and then provide the necessary lib/gnuplot/

Bug#540406: the wxt driver deserves its own package

Hi, I think the current configuration can also confuse users, because the names suggest, that only X11 and qt are supported as interactive terminals: gnuplot-nox: no interactive terminals gnuplot-x11: X11 and wxt (wxt is default) gnuplot-qt: X11, wxt, and qt (wxt is default) But I have no

Bug#540406: the wxt driver deserves its own package

Source: gnuplot Version: 4.2.2-1.2 Severity: wishlist The `x11' and `wxt' drivers are quite distinct, and one may opt to install one of them but not other, which is clearly impossible when they belong to the same package. Please consider splitting `gnuplot-x11'