Hi,
Any news on this bug since April ?
As co-maintainer of calligra, I understand the benefit of a standard way for
localisation. But « pt-br » or «ptbr », I don't care. If a majority already
uses « pt-br », then go for it.
What's the opinion of the KDE team ? Are you ready to change too ?
reassign 544600 kde-l10n
thanks
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 03:27:52PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
On 10:50 Sat 09 Oct , Daniel Baumann wrote:
DB ping.
I was in vacation (offline). I don't want to change packages' names
until squeeze is out. Also I doubt that this action is required.
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 09:49:12AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
reassign 544600 kde-l10n
thanks
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 03:27:52PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
On 10:50 Sat 09 Oct , Daniel Baumann wrote:
DB ping.
I was in vacation (offline). I don't want to change packages'
On 10:50 Sat 09 Oct , Daniel Baumann wrote:
DB ping.
I was in vacation (offline). I don't want to change packages' names
until squeeze is out. Also I doubt that this action is required. There
is a heap of packages have the same names, for ex
openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br. I don't think that KDE
ping.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org wrote:
Why? I don't understand.
because, obviously, it sucks that l10n packages do not use the same
naming scheme within debian, making it a pita to know that e.g it's
iceweasel-l10n-pt-br but it's iceweasel-l10n-ptbr etc. which is e.g. a
big problem for
DB Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org wrote:
Why? I don't understand.
DB because, obviously, it sucks that l10n packages do not use the same
DB naming scheme within debian, making it a pita to know that e.g it's
DB iceweasel-l10n-pt-br but it's iceweasel-l10n-ptbr etc. which is e.g. a
DB big
Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
Where is the document of this subject?
for what, using a common l10n package naming scheme, or that debian-live
has troubles because the l10n packages are not named consistently?
for the first, there is none in public i guess, for the second,
discussion can be found in
Why? I don't understand.
--
... mpd is off
. ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’ : email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru
`. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21
`- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555 E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537
signature.asc
Description:
Package: iceweasel-l10n
iceweasel-l10n should use same l10n package names as kde-l10n.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
10 matches
Mail list logo
