On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:03:00AM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Od: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de
Just a heads-up that this bug is becoming more important. Today I
stumbled upon it when a routine aptitude safe-upgrade wanted to
install a whole bunch of new packages, including the jackd sound
Just a heads-up that this bug is becoming more important. Today I
stumbled upon it when a routine aptitude safe-upgrade wanted to
install a whole bunch of new packages, including the jackd sound server,
a package which I definitely do _not_ want on my system.
It turns out that this happened
Od: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de
Just a heads-up that this bug is becoming more important. Today I
stumbled upon it when a routine aptitude safe-upgrade wanted to
install a whole bunch of new packages, including the jackd sound server,
a package which I definitely do _not_ want on my
Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz writes:
Od: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Package: libslv2-9
Version: 0.6.6-2
Severity: important
new gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad adds an LV2 plugin, and thus depends on
libslv2-9. Because that package
Reinhard Tartler schrieb:
Suggests would be fine.
Same opinion.
What about libslv2-dev package and Recommends: slv2-doc?
I'd also prefer Suggests here!
Fabian
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Package: libslv2-9
Version: 0.6.6-2
Severity: important
new gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad adds an LV2 plugin, and thus depends on
libslv2-9. Because that package recommends slv2-jack, this upgrade
results in:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
jackd jackd-firewire libffado1 libfreebob0
6 matches
Mail list logo
