Bug#555532: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#555532: nagios: uninstallable/unbuildable on non-linux

2010-01-13 Thread Petr Salinger
You can of course conditionalize build-dependencies and dependencies based on architecture. This way configuration on linux could remain the same (no regression) and on previously uninstallable architectures there could be limited functionality (improvement). See bellow for idea. I have

Bug#555532: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#555532: nagios: uninstallable/unbuildable on non-linux

2010-01-12 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Petr, many thanks for your answer. On Monday, 11. January 2010, Petr Salinger wrote: You can of course conditionalize build-dependencies and dependencies based on architecture. This way configuration on linux could remain the same (no regression) and on previously uninstallable

Bug#555532: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#555532: nagios: uninstallable/unbuildable on non-linux

2010-01-11 Thread Petr Salinger
a short status update of the bug. With upstream I managed to get the stuff to compile and running on the first look. After testing the package for a while, I recognized that the migration over to iputils-ping introduces a regression. If a echo reply is missing, check_ping seems to return nothing,

Bug#555532: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#555532: nagios: uninstallable/unbuildable on non-linux

2010-01-10 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, On Tuesday, 10. November 2009, Petr Salinger wrote: it seems that the nagios related packages need an ping command available. They choose iputils-ping, which is rather linux specific. Could be possible to switch (at least on non-linux) to inetutils-ping (already available) or fping

Bug#555532: nagios: uninstallable/unbuildable on non-linux

2009-11-10 Thread Petr Salinger
Package: nagios-plugins, nagios3 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, it seems that the nagios related packages need an ping command available. They choose iputils-ping, which is rather linux specific. Could be possible to switch (at least on non-linux)