Package: udev
Version: 147~git20091109-1
Severity: normal
I don't know, is an initialization error the same as a creation error?
Trying to upgrade udev an hour or so ago, I get:
setting up udev (147~git20091109-1) ...
error initializing netlink socket
Cannot start udevd. (rc=3)
--
On Nov 10, Gordon Haverland ghave...@materialisations.com wrote:
I don't know, is an initialization error the same as a creation error?
Trying to upgrade udev an hour or so ago, I get:
setting up udev (147~git20091109-1) ...
error initializing netlink socket
Cannot start udevd. (rc=3)
This
On November 10, 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 10, Gordon Haverland ghave...@materialisations.com
wrote:
I don't know, is an initialization error the same as a
creation error? Trying to upgrade udev an hour or so ago, I
get:
setting up udev (147~git20091109-1) ...
error initializing
On Nov 10, Gordon Haverland ghave...@materialisations.com wrote:
I haven't run standard debian kernels in a very long time. What
is wrong?
Who knows? You built it, not me.
Another option is to try a kernel = 2.6.27.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: udev
Version: 147~git20091109-1
Severity: normal
I can see exactly the same error with a standard kernel from debian
repositories.
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 24
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Jun 11 16:34 025_libgphoto2.rules -
This is what I get when trying to start udevd manually with debug
enabled:
r...@xqueralt:xavier # udevd --debug
1257866619.206091 [29845] udev_monitor_new_from_netlink: error getting
socket: Invalid argument
error initializing netlink socket
1257866619.206111 [29845] main: error initializing
On Nov 10, Xavier Queralt xquer...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see exactly the same error with a standard kernel from debian
repositories.
Looks like 147 requires 2.6.27.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
El dt 10 de 11 de 2009 a les 16:45 +0100, en/na Marco d'Itri va
escriure:
On Nov 10, Xavier Queralt xquer...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see exactly the same error with a standard kernel from debian
repositories.
Looks like 147 requires 2.6.27.
Right, I've just updated to 2.6.30 and
On 2009-11-10 16:45:03 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Looks like 147 requires 2.6.27.
Yes, same problem with a non-Debian 2.6.26 kernel (some later kernel
was broken, but I haven't tried a more recent for several months).
With udev 146, I recently noticed the following warning:
udev: missing
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 07:39:23AM -0700, Gordon Haverland wrote:
On November 10, 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 10, Gordon Haverland ghave...@materialisations.com
wrote:
I don't know, is an initialization error the same as a
creation error? Trying to upgrade udev an hour or so ago, I
On Nov 10, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
commit 26347a4c5538008318188118872490128f43fcd3 looks suspicious. udev
should probably keep a fallback for kernel versions without the flags.
There is also something incompatible related to inotify in 147, upstream
just does not care about
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 16:45:03 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 10, Xavier Queralt xquer...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see exactly the same error with a standard kernel from debian
repositories.
Looks like 147 requires 2.6.27.
commit 26347a4c5538008318188118872490128f43fcd3 looks
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 18:05:05 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 10, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
commit 26347a4c5538008318188118872490128f43fcd3 looks suspicious. udev
should probably keep a fallback for kernel versions without the flags.
There is also something
On Nov 10, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Do you have any details? I skimmed through the 146-147 changes, and
Nevermind, it's inotify-with-flags also in that commit.
the CLOEXEC flags were the only commit I found that could break on older
kernels. I might have missed something
14 matches
Mail list logo
