On 2011 m. rugpjūčio 7 d., sekmadienis 15:50:32 Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Joachim wrote:
Hi folks,
with this change from dpkg-dev git:
,
| * dpkg-buildpackage no longer exports the compiler flags. Closes:
| #560070
|
| Packages must directly call dpkg-buildflags
Modestas Vainius wrote:
I don't think it is a fair statement. Examples of minimal dh rules all over
the place in your blog, debhelper package and dh manual page DO NOT have
build
flags handling. It is true that it's the result of inappropriate dpkg-
buildpackage behaviour but it's still a
Hi folks,
with this change from dpkg-dev git:
,
| * dpkg-buildpackage no longer exports the compiler flags. Closes: #560070
| Packages must directly call dpkg-buildflags to retrieve them.
`
and the following from debhelper 8.9.4:
,
| * dpkg-buildflags is only used to set
On Sun, 07 Aug 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
| * dpkg-buildflags is only used to set environment in v9, to avoid
| re-breaking packages that were already broken a first time by
| dpkg-buildpackage unconditionally setting the environment, and
| worked around that by unsetting
Sven Joachim wrote:
Hi folks,
with this change from dpkg-dev git:
,
| * dpkg-buildpackage no longer exports the compiler flags. Closes: #560070
| Packages must directly call dpkg-buildflags to retrieve them.
`
and the following from debhelper 8.9.4:
,
| *
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Joey, once the new dpkg is in unstable, can we revert this and get the
packages fixed to use the proper dpkg-buildflags interface to adjust
the flags to avoid the failure?
Because in my opinion, it's much more important to have a wide usage of
dpkg-buildflags. You
Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Joachim wrote:
, compiler flags are not set at all for packages using dh-style rules
files, unless those packages are upgraded to debhelper compatibility
level 9. That does not seem to be an acceptable outcome.
It's Not My Problem. Build flags are also not set for
On 2011-08-07 15:17 +0200, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Joachim wrote:
, compiler flags are not set at all for packages using dh-style rules
files, unless those packages are upgraded to debhelper compatibility
level 9. That does not seem to be an acceptable outcome.
It's
On Sun, 07 Aug 2011, Joey Hess wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Joey, once the new dpkg is in unstable, can we revert this and get the
packages fixed to use the proper dpkg-buildflags interface to adjust
the flags to avoid the failure?
Because in my opinion, it's much more important to
9 matches
Mail list logo
