On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 03:07:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
please indicate as such; otherwise
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
maintainer to downgrade the
On 08/20/2010 01:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Daniel, can you please remove this binary package from unstable?
rather than that, i've downgraded the depends to suggests.
note that if you unblock live-config 2.0.x that you want to unblock
live-boot 2.0.x too.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 17:07:22 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
After some discussion, we feel that the fact that runit-run can be
installed, and unless further manual action is taken, it will make the
computer unbootable to indicate that the package is unreleaseable.
It's not getting removed
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
maintainer to downgrade the severity of this bug if the maintainer
feels that it is releasable.
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
* We decided to refer to the Release Team the question as to
whether the package is releaseable in its current state.
So, we would appreciate it if you would take a look at this situation
and decide. When you've decided you should probably set the
The package runinit-run, if successfully installed, generally breaks
the system by breaking booting. The administrator is supposed to fix
up the boot arrangements by converting startup scripts etc. after
installing runinit-run.
The administrator's attention is drawn to this by a debconf
7 matches
Mail list logo
