Hi Adam!
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
A couple of packages which weren't ready got removed from testing in the
process, but they should be able to go back in once they're ready.
Perfect.
Thank you a lot for helping in such smooth (if we
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 07:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- the imagemagick upload introduced a regression in font handling, which
will be fixed by a new upload reverting the responsible patch (#573983)
- librmagick-ruby ftbfs, partly due to an issue fixed upstream and
partly due to the
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 19:59 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I've just scheduled the necessary binNMUs, with a dep-wait on
imagemagick (= 7:6.6.0.4-1).
A quick update on where we currently are (please feel free to correct):
- the imagemagick upload introduced a regression in font handling, which
Hi,
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
On #564123 we saw that imagemagick upstream did some incompatible ABI
changes, without updating the SONAME version.
They did change it later and we have an updated package available on
experimental.
A simple binNMU of the affected packages should be enough.
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable; we'll then schedule the
binNMUs.
Uploaded to unstable.
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 16:33 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable; we'll then schedule the
binNMUs.
Uploaded to unstable.
Well timed, to get it in just before a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi!
On #564123 we saw that imagemagick upstream did some incompatible ABI changes,
without updating the SONAME version.
They did change it later and we have an updated package available
7 matches
Mail list logo
