On 3 janv. 2014, at 04:19, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
at this point of the discussion (both here and with upstream), it
seems to me that this bug has nothing to do anymore on the pidgin-otr
bugs list. It should be converted into a RFP (request for package)
asking for
Thibaut Varène wrote (03 Jan 2014 11:05:08 GMT) :
How about taking over maintainership? I don't use pidgin-otr anymore.
I don't really want to add more individually maintained packages to my
plate, especially not ones when upstream code is C.
However, I have a draft unfinished email proposing a
intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
at this point of the discussion (both here and with upstream), it
seems to me that this bug has nothing to do anymore on the pidgin-otr
bugs list. It should be converted into a RFP (request for package)
asking for purple-otr, right? I'm happy to do so if Thibaut or Howard
Control: retitle -1 Please support the finch client
Control: affects -1 + finch
Hi,
Howard Chu wrote (03 Jan 2014 21:37:10 GMT) :
intrigeri wrote:
at this point of the discussion (both here and with upstream), it
seems to me that this bug has nothing to do anymore on the pidgin-otr
bugs
Hi,
at this point of the discussion (both here and with upstream), it
seems to me that this bug has nothing to do anymore on the pidgin-otr
bugs list. It should be converted into a RFP (request for package)
asking for purple-otr, right? I'm happy to do so if Thibaut or Howard
give me a go-ahead.
Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Howard Chuh...@highlandsun.com wrote:
Just fyi, all of my pidgin/finch patches have been merged upstream. They're
targeted at a 3.0.0 release though, so it doesn't seem there will be any
official 2.10.x update with the features enabled.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Howard Chu h...@highlandsun.com wrote:
Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Howard Chuh...@highlandsun.com wrote:
Just fyi, all of my pidgin/finch patches have been merged upstream.
They're
targeted at a 3.0.0 release though, so it
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Howard Chu h...@highlandsun.com wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
Just for reference, the upstream bug report has been re-opened since I
started
working on the issue:
http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/11623
3 out of 4 of my patches have already been integrated into
Howard Chu wrote:
Just for reference, the upstream bug report has been re-opened since I started
working on the issue:
http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/11623
3 out of 4 of my patches have already been integrated into pidgin upstream,
and I expect the last will be merged soon.
Just fyi, all
Thibaut VARENE wrote:
Thanks for your effort.
Let us know how the upstream integration is going on.
If you have a chance, you might want to take a look at the bugs listed
here[0], and see if your rewrite fixes any of them (other than the
ones you have already commented on).
[0]
Thanks for your effort.
Let us know how the upstream integration is going on.
If you have a chance, you might want to take a look at the bugs listed
here[0], and see if your rewrite fixes any of them (other than the
ones you have already commented on).
[0]
I've rewritten the pidgin-otr-3.2.0 plugin to use the libpurple API, so a
single plugin works for both pidgin and finch. Details are here
http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/pipermail/otr-dev/2011-December/001237.html
and the source code is here
https://gitorious.org/purple-otr
I expect that with
12 matches
Mail list logo
