Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2012-03-18 Thread Jan Echternach
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 05:18:48PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Does this still occur with current kernels? I don't get this warning anymore since updating from 3.2.6-1 to 3.2.7-1. -- Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2011-09-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
Jan Echternach reported that on his system it8213 provokes the warning Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19 when probed at boot time. The previous messages are logged at http://bugs.debian.org/590327. On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 20:49 +0200, Jan Echternach wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 05:18:48PM +0200,

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2011-09-06 Thread David Miller
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 05:16:01 +0100 This is somewhat unusual in that the IDE controller will be sharing its IRQ, but that's supposed to work. However, the IDE core attempts to disable and enable the IRQ *before* it allocates it. If the UHCI driver

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2011-09-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 00:39 -0400, David Miller wrote: From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 05:16:01 +0100 This is somewhat unusual in that the IDE controller will be sharing its IRQ, but that's supposed to work. However, the IDE core attempts to disable and

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2011-09-06 Thread David Miller
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 05:58:33 +0100 Well, I'm concerned with what to do in distro configurations which aren't just for 'modern systems'. We already swapped over all the drivers not labelled as experimental. With the rest, I worry that we'd be

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2011-08-05 Thread Jonathan Nieder
found 590327 linux-2.6/3.0.0-1 retitle 590327 [it8213] linux: WARNING: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19 quit Hi, Jan Echternach wrote: Yes. Here's a warning from kernel version 3.0.0-1: Thanks. Marking accordingly. I wonder if the pata_it8213 driver (CONFIG_PATA_IT8213) works better. -- To

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2011-07-31 Thread Jan Echternach
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 05:18:48PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Does this still occur with current kernels? Yes. Here's a warning from kernel version 3.0.0-1: [1.984004] [ cut here ] [1.984009] WARNING: at

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2011-07-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 02:07:15AM +0200, Jan Echternach wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 06:02:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Let us know the bug number or URL so that we can track it. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16481 Does this still occur with current kernels? Cheers,

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2010-07-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 00:30 +0200, Jan Echternach wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: minor I'm getting this warning for quite a while now, but not on every boot. Stack traces below ide_pci_init_two differ slightly. I've also tried the current experimental kernel, but

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2010-07-29 Thread Jan Echternach
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 06:02:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Let us know the bug number or URL so that we can track it. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16481 -- Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19

2010-07-25 Thread Jan Echternach
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: minor I'm getting this warning for quite a while now, but not on every boot. Stack traces below ide_pci_init_two differ slightly. I've also tried the current experimental kernel, but the warning is still there (although the stack trace is somewhat