Bug#614316: ncurses-base: Update mach* terminfo

2012-01-29 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-01-22 19:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Thomas Dickey, le Sat 23 Apr 2011 15:05:50 -0400, a écrit : What's the source for this? The only mach sources I see are for Mach 3.0 at CMU - and the console sequences are much cruder than that used here. Oops, it seems I have missed this

Bug#614316: ncurses-base: Update mach* terminfo

2012-01-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sven Joachim, le Sun 29 Jan 2012 14:32:37 +0100, a écrit : On 2012-01-22 19:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Thomas Dickey, le Sat 23 Apr 2011 15:05:50 -0400, a écrit : What's the source for this? The only mach sources I see are for Mach 3.0 at CMU - and the console sequences are much

Bug#614316: ncurses-base: Update mach* terminfo

2012-01-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Dickey, le Sun 22 Jan 2012 20:40:28 -0500, a écrit : On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 07:28:14PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Thomas Dickey, le Sat 23 Apr 2011 15:05:50 -0400, a ?crit : What's the source for this? The only mach sources I see are for Mach 3.0 at CMU - and the console

Bug#614316: ncurses-base: Update mach* terminfo

2012-01-22 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-04-23 21:05 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote: What's the source for this? The only mach sources I see are for Mach 3.0 at CMU - and the console sequences are much cruder than that used here. Samuel, could you please follow up here? You need to convince Thomas to include your patch if you

Bug#614316: ncurses-base: Update mach* terminfo

2012-01-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Thomas Dickey, le Sat 23 Apr 2011 15:05:50 -0400, a écrit : What's the source for this? The only mach sources I see are for Mach 3.0 at CMU - and the console sequences are much cruder than that used here. Oops, it seems I have missed this mail. The source is the GNU Mach, which is a

Bug#614316: ncurses-base: Update mach* terminfo

2012-01-22 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 07:28:14PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Thomas Dickey, le Sat 23 Apr 2011 15:05:50 -0400, a ?crit : What's the source for this? The only mach sources I see are for Mach 3.0 at CMU - and the console sequences are much cruder than that used here. Oops, it

Bug#614316: ncurses-base: Update mach* terminfo

2011-04-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
What's the source for this? The only mach sources I see are for Mach 3.0 at CMU - and the console sequences are much cruder than that used here. -- Thomas E. Dickey dic...@invisible-island.net http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#614316: ncurses-base: Update mach* terminfo

2011-03-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Here is a fixed patch which adds a few missing semi-graphical characters. Samuel diff --git a/misc/terminfo.src b/misc/terminfo.src index 3d2942c..9fc7c8e 100644 --- a/misc/terminfo.src +++ b/misc/terminfo.src @@ -1035,17 +1035,21 @@ bterm|bogl virtual terminal, mach|Mach Console,

Bug#614316: ncurses-base: Update mach* terminfo

2011-02-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: ncurses-base Version: 5.7+20100313-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hello, Here is a patch to update the mach* entries. Samuel -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,