reopen 620421
thanks
Hello,
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 05:29:12 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
I'm describing (actually, repeating) what was in the initial bug
report for that test, modulo my misunderstanding about Bash's
special treatment of that path.
The initial bug report
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:36:04PM +0300, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
reopen 620421
thanks
Hello,
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 05:29:12 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
I'm describing (actually, repeating) what was in the initial bug
report for that test, modulo my
On 04/13/2011 10:12 PM, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:04:54 +0200
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
I confirm the bug.
# cat /dev/null /dev/tcp/localhost/111
-su: /dev/tcp/localhost/111: No such file or directory
Unless you show that you:
1) have bash 4.1-3
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:28:54 +0200
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
If it's the only case, it should be specified explicitly. And, after
all, why not use the utility that is supposed to be used, and not
this hackish thing?
The only reason it was implemented this way is because
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:39:37PM +0300, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
[...]
Well, we only guarantee to support upgrades from stable to the next
one. Obviously we will try to not break things in unstable and
testing. Though it's not uncommon to make the assumption that users
have at least
On 04/13/2011 10:39 PM, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:28:54 +0200
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
If it's the only case, it should be specified explicitly. And, after
all, why not use the utility that is supposed to be used, and not
this hackish thing?
The
On 13-Apr-2011, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:12:15 +0300
From: Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by
Message-ID: 20110413231215.189a2fc2@ileemo
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:04:54 +0200
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Unless you show that you:
1) have bash
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:01:26PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On 04/13/2011 10:39 PM, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
[...]
It could be replaced by rpcinfo (as suggested before) which is provided
by libc-bin, so no extra dependencies and no breakage. Why not? Why
such a resistance?
I didn't see
On 04/13/2011 11:32 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:01:26PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On 04/13/2011 10:39 PM, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
[...]
It could be replaced by rpcinfo (as suggested before) which is provided
by libc-bin, so no extra dependencies and no breakage. Why
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 11:54 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
On 02-Apr-2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Which version of bash is installed?
$ aptitude show bash | grep '^Version:'
Version: 4.1-3
$ /bin/bash --version
GNU bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu)
So in what sense does
On 03-Apr-2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So in what sense does the test 'not work'?
It fails (exits with a non-zero status), even though the ‘portmapper’
service is running.
Does 'cat /dev/null /dev/tcp/localhost/111' produce any error
message?
No.
--
\ “It is the integrity of each
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 13:43 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
On 03-Apr-2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So in what sense does the test 'not work'?
It fails (exits with a non-zero status), even though the ‘portmapper’
service is running.
Does 'cat /dev/null /dev/tcp/localhost/111' produce any error
On 03-Apr-2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So you're saying that on your system, the 'cat' command can silently
fail?
I'm describing (actually, repeating) what was in the initial bug
report for that test, modulo my misunderstanding about Bash's special
treatment of that path.
For now, I've worked
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.2.2-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The ‘/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server’ script has a new dependency on a
non-existent directory:
=
# See if portmap or rpcbind are running
(cat /dev/null /dev/tcp/localhost/111)
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 07:00:11 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
The ‘/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server’ script has a new dependency on a
non-existent directory:
It's not supposed to be a directory, it's a bash feature for
redirections to tcp sockets.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 01-Apr-2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 07:00:11 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
The ‘/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server’ script has a new dependency on
a non-existent directory:
It's not supposed to be a directory, it's a bash feature for
redirections to tcp sockets.
Okay.
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:42:09AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
On 01-Apr-2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 07:00:11 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
The ‘/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server’ script has a new dependency on
a non-existent directory:
It's not supposed to be a
On 02-Apr-2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Which version of bash is installed?
$ aptitude show bash | grep '^Version:'
Version: 4.1-3
$ /bin/bash --version
GNU bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu)
--
\“There are no significant bugs in our released software that |
`\
18 matches
Mail list logo
