Hello,
regarding bug #621170 filed against gnu-smalltak for *.la removal, here
is the current situation:
gnu-smalltalk packages contains /usr/lib/gnu-smalltalk/libc.la
I'm attaching it here for the reference.
Please note that the .la file is *not* in a -dev package. It's not
intended to be
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:25:34 +0200
Thomas Girard thomas.g.gir...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
regarding bug #621170 filed against gnu-smalltak for *.la removal, here
is the current situation:
gnu-smalltalk packages contains /usr/lib/gnu-smalltalk/libc.la
I'm attaching it here for the
On 04/06/2011 09:28 PM, codeh...@debian.org wrote:
gnu-smalltalk appears in this list as a source package because one or
more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la
files.
I believe this is just the libc.la which is not a normal .la file and
should not be removed.
Paolo
Hello,
Le 07/04/2011 09:10, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
On 04/06/2011 09:28 PM, codeh...@debian.org wrote:
gnu-smalltalk appears in this list as a source package because one or
more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la
files.
I believe this is just the libc.la which is
On 04/07/2011 12:17 PM, Thomas Girard wrote:
Hello,
Le 07/04/2011 09:10, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
On 04/06/2011 09:28 PM, codeh...@debian.org wrote:
gnu-smalltalk appears in this list as a source package because one or
more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la
files.
I
5 matches
Mail list logo
