[ Re-sent to the right recipients. ]
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
All new versions of the core GNUstep packages are already in
experimental. A routine rebuild revealed only 6 bugs, all of them
having a fix available now:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
We'd like to have a list of packages which are part of this transition.
Dependency level 1 (build-depends only on libgnustep-base-dev):
biococoa
gnustep-netclasses
mknfonts.tool
oolite
pantomime1.2
Dependency level 2
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:48:57AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
We'd like to have a list of packages which are part of this transition.
[…]
libgnustep-base1.20 vs libgnustep-base1.22
libgnustep-gui0.18 vs libgnustep-gui0.20
Ok,
At Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:39:10 +0200,
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:13:47 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20-1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18-0.20) *and*
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 19:34:46 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I'm afraid I don't understand the question -- do you want a list of
other (non-GNUstep) libraries possibly affecting the transition
(poppler, ffmpeg, etc.) or you'd like to know which of the GNUstep
packages depend on gnustep-gui
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:13:47 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20-1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18-0.20) *and*
libobjc2-3, ideally coinciding with the migration of
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20-1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18-0.20) *and*
libobjc2-3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to
testing (or even better, before that).
That seems
On 06/08/2011 08:19 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:44:15 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
1) The modified gnustep-make package will have no trouble migrating to
testing (before the transition even commences), so it would make
GNUstep development in
Hi,
I've a hard time understanding what the current status of this
transition is. Anyone willing to sum up?
(I'm interested in it as it blocks #619602 - ITP: theunarchiver.)
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:44:15 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
1) The modified gnustep-make package will have no trouble migrating to
testing (before the transition even commences), so it would make
GNUstep development in wheezy broken, just like it is now in sid.
Broken how?
2)
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:44:15 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
1) The modified gnustep-make package will have no trouble migrating to
testing (before the transition even commences), so it would make
GNUstep development in wheezy broken, just like it is now in sid.
On 06/07/2011 01:33 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
On 06/07/2011 01:03 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20-1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18-0.20) *and*
libobjc2-3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to
Matthias Klose wrote:
On 06/07/2011 01:33 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
gnustep-base/1.22.0-1 currently build-depends on gobjc (= 4:4.6).
My plan was to change it to gobjc (= 4:4.6) [!ia64 !sparc],
gobjc-4.6. Is that good enough?
no, for that case, you need to use gcc-4.6 as the driver. If
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20-1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18-0.20) *and*
libobjc2-3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to
testing (or
On 06/07/2011 01:03 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20-1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18-0.20) *and*
libobjc2-3, ideally coinciding
Matthias Klose wrote:
On 06/07/2011 01:03 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20-1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18-0.20) *and*
libobjc2-3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to
testing (or even better, before that).
16 matches
Mail list logo
