Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-17 Thread Julien Cristau
Quick update on the libevent2 transition: On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:32:53 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:15:41 +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: I'll upload 2.0.x to upstable soon. Rebuilds of dependent packages have been scheduled, with these missing bits:

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-17 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 17/12/11 12:14, Julien Cristau wrote: - transmission: #650812 That bug is fixed, but migration is still blocked by #642538. Sorry, this is actually fixed in the package, but I left the bug open because I wanted to find a proper fix for upstream (the debian patch turned out to be a bad

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:32:53 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:15:41 +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: I'll upload 2.0.x to upstable soon. Rebuilds of dependent packages have been scheduled, with these missing bits: - chromium-browser: needs a fix for

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-07 Thread Sam Hartman
Well, I've taken a bit of a look at python-event. Unfortunately, it looks like it simply doesn't support libevent2. It seems to dig into the bufferevent structs a lot in ways that have changed between libevent 1.x and 2.x. There was a release this year after a several year gap, but as far as I

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-07 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Hi, On 07/12/11 19:02, Julien Cristau wrote: - getstream: #622278 - honeyd: #632765 - ladvd: #650670 - python-event: #632763 - transmission: #650812 I'm also the maintainer here, but the version currently in experimental is blocked by a build-dep on libminiupnpc-dev (= 1.6) (which is also

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:15:41 +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: I'll upload 2.0.x to upstable soon. Rebuilds of dependent packages have been scheduled, with these missing bits: - chromium-browser: needs a fix for #647992 - getstream: #622278 - honeyd: #632765 - ladvd: #650670 -

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-11-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 00:22:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 16:30:19 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which I'd like to migrate to unstable as soon as possible. Since I'm the new guy helping out with

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-11-24 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:56:16PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 00:22:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 16:30:19 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which I'd like to migrate to unstable

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-11-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 16:30:19 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which I'd like to migrate to unstable as soon as possible. Since I'm the new guy helping out with libevent and since this would be my first bigish transition, I'd like to

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-09-23 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/09/2011 01:01 AM, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: So is there anything I can do to help get things going? (assuming I *could* help) It would help to fix (at least) memcached (current RC bugs, and wrt libevent 2.0) before starting the transition. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-09-07 Thread Romain Francoise
Hi, Any progress on this transition? Thanks, -- Romain Francoise rfranco...@debian.org http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-08-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 01:01:53 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: On 08/08/11 22:05, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 13:03:29 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: I didn't get an explicit answer about this, so I thought I might ask more directly: is it ok if I simply

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-08-08 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
[please CC] Hi, On 19/06/11 16:30, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which I'd like to migrate to unstable as soon as possible. Since I'm the new guy helping out with libevent and since this would be my first bigish transition, I'd like to

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-08-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 13:03:29 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: I didn't get an explicit answer about this, so I thought I might ask more directly: is it ok if I simply upload the new libevent to unstable? No, it's not. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-08-08 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 08/08/11 22:05, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 13:03:29 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: I didn't get an explicit answer about this, so I thought I might ask more directly: is it ok if I simply upload the new libevent to unstable? No, it's not. Ok, fair enough. So is

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-06-19 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition On 06/19/2011 04:30 PM, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: [please CC] Please subscribe to this (being filed) bugreport. Hi, I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which