On 09/05/2011 11:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The code dump actually corresponds to this line in update_sg_lb_stats(),
which has been compiled inline with find_busiest_group():
sgs-avg_load = (sgs-group_load * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) / group-cpu_power;
OK, i'm happy to take your word for it.
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:35:32AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/05/2011 11:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The code dump actually corresponds to this line in update_sg_lb_stats(),
which has been compiled inline with find_busiest_group():
sgs-avg_load = (sgs-group_load *
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 14:35 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 08/29/2011 02:40 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This is what I've added for 2.6.32-36. Any review would be appreciated.
Thanks, Ben!
Two crashes i have documentation for show the division-by-zero error
happening in
On 08/29/2011 02:40 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This is what I've added for 2.6.32-36. Any review would be appreciated.
Thanks, Ben!
Two crashes i have documentation for show the division-by-zero error
happening in find_busiest_group, which was patched in the initial diff i
submitted, but not in
This is what I've added for 2.6.32-36. Any review would be appreciated.
Ben.
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Subject: sched: Work around sched_group::cpu_power = 0
#636797 and others report a division by zero in the scheduler due
to sched_group::cpu_power. Try to work out why this is
Ben Hutchings wrote:
This is what I've added for 2.6.32-36. Any review would be
appreciated.
Looks good to me.
Possibly relevant upstream commits:
v2.6.34-rc1~260^2~15 (sched: Fix the place where group powers are
updated)
v2.6.36-rc1~531^2~4 (sched: Reduce update_group_power() calls)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just wanted to ask if there's already some progress on this?
I created a patch like suggested in bugzilla#13
Can anyone please review this patch?
Would it make sense to create a patch that does the devide-by-zero
workaround and also throws a
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:26 +0200, Bjoern Boschman wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to ask if there's already some progress on this?
I created a patch like suggested in bugzilla#13
Can anyone please review this patch?
Would it make sense to create a patch that does the devide-by-zero
workaround
8 matches
Mail list logo
