Bug#637688: [mercurial] unable to reproduce bug

2011-08-30 Thread Simon L'nu
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 14:12:17 -0400, Simon wrote: On 2011-08-16 03:49, Javi Merino wrote: Hi Chris, BTW in case this may help, I'm including the output of the following command: $ ls -ld

Bug#637688: [mercurial] unable to reproduce bug

2011-08-18 Thread Simon
On 2011-08-16 03:49, Javi Merino wrote: Hi Chris, BTW in case this may help, I'm including the output of the following command: $ ls -ld /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages ls: cannot access /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages: No such file or directory a symlink to dist-packages/ -- To

Bug#637688: [mercurial] unable to reproduce bug

2011-08-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 14:12:17 -0400, Simon wrote: On 2011-08-16 03:49, Javi Merino wrote: Hi Chris, BTW in case this may help, I'm including the output of the following command: $ ls -ld /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages ls: cannot access /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages: No

Bug#637688: [mercurial] unable to reproduce bug

2011-08-16 Thread Javi Merino
Hi Chris, On 15/08/11 23:16, Chris Knadle wrote: Package: mercurial Version: 1.9.1-2 As I don't use Mercurial much (I mostly use Git) I decided to test the upgrade due to this bug, and was unable to reproduce it. In my case no byte-compiled files were removed. You are upgrading from

Bug#637688: [mercurial] unable to reproduce bug

2011-08-15 Thread Chris Knadle
Package: mercurial Version: 1.9.1-2 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- As I don't use Mercurial much (I mostly use Git) I decided to test the upgrade due to this bug, and was unable to reproduce it. In my case no byte-compiled files were removed. The relevant output (from