Bug#637758: libmp4v2-dev: Should be architecture any and not all

2011-08-14 Thread Christian Marillat
Package: libmp4v2-dev Version: 1.9.1+svn479~dfsg0-1 Severity: grave Hi, *-dev package should be architecture any as files are binary dependant. Christian -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel:

Bug#637758: libmp4v2-dev: Should be architecture any and not all

2011-08-14 Thread Alessio Treglia
Version: 1.9.1+svn479~dfsg0-1 On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@debian.org wrote: *-dev package should be architecture any as files are binary dependant. debian/control says: Package: libmp4v2-dev Section: libdevel Architecture: all Depends: Hence,

Bug#637758: libmp4v2-dev: Should be architecture any and not all

2011-08-14 Thread Christian Marillat
reopen 637758 thanks Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org writes: Version: 1.9.1+svn479~dfsg0-1 On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@debian.org wrote: *-dev package should be architecture any as files are binary dependant. debian/control says: Package:

Bug#637758: libmp4v2-dev: Should be architecture any and not all

2011-08-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:48:09 (CEST), Alessio Treglia wrote: Version: 1.9.1+svn479~dfsg0-1 On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@debian.org wrote: *-dev package should be architecture any as files are binary dependant. debian/control says: Package:

Bug#637758: libmp4v2-dev: Should be architecture any and not all

2011-08-14 Thread Christian Marillat
Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org writes: Version: 1.9.1+svn479~dfsg0-1 On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@debian.org wrote: *-dev package should be architecture any as files are binary dependant. debian/control says: Package: libmp4v2-dev Section:

Bug#637758: libmp4v2-dev: Should be architecture any and not all

2011-08-14 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@debian.org wrote: This package should be architecture *any*. Sorry, was my mistake, I've misread the report. Reinhard has already committed the fix. Cheers, -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer