Bug#638926: emacs23: FTBFS on any-i386: bogus path due to #define i386 1

2011-08-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 02:41 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Package: emacs23 Version: 23.3+1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hello, emacs23 currently FTBFS on any-i386, because gcc #defines i386 to 1, which gets in the way of include paths: see attached log, in particular ...

Bug#638926: emacs23: FTBFS on any-i386: bogus path due to #define i386 1

2011-08-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sven Joachim, le Tue 23 Aug 2011 07:41:39 +0200, a écrit : On 2011-08-23 02:41 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: emacs23 currently FTBFS on any-i386, because gcc #defines i386 to 1, which gets in the way of include paths: Already reported as #620795 (marked as forwarded, which explains why

Bug#638926: emacs23: FTBFS on any-i386: bogus path due to #define i386 1

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Browning
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org writes: Sven Joachim, le Tue 23 Aug 2011 07:41:39 +0200, a écrit : On 2011-08-23 02:41 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: emacs23 currently FTBFS on any-i386, because gcc #defines i386 to 1, which gets in the way of include paths: Already reported as

Bug#638926: emacs23: FTBFS on any-i386: bogus path due to #define i386 1

2011-08-22 Thread Sven Joachim
forcemerge 620795 638926 thanks On 2011-08-23 02:41 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: emacs23 currently FTBFS on any-i386, because gcc #defines i386 to 1, which gets in the way of include paths: Already reported as #620795 (marked as forwarded, which explains why you overlooked it). Cheers,