Bug#639596: Please compile with visibility=default

2011-09-04 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 28/08/2011 15:35, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: On 08/28/2011 03:31 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: Shouldn't the solution be to move v8::internal::I18NExtension::get() to v8 (not internal) namespace ? Yes, but I suspect there are a lot of v8::internal() needed by chromium. Cheers, Giuseppe. v8

Bug#639596: Please compile with visibility=default

2011-08-31 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 28/08/2011 15:35, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: On 08/28/2011 03:31 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: Shouldn't the solution be to move v8::internal::I18NExtension::get() to v8 (not internal) namespace ? Yes, but I suspect there are a lot of v8::internal() needed by chromium. A quick investigation

Bug#639596: Please compile with visibility=default

2011-08-28 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Package: libv8 Version: 3.4.14.13-2 Severity: important Tags: experimental patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm preparing chromium 14 for experimental, and it FTFBS with this: LINK(target) out/Release/chrome

Bug#639596: Please compile with visibility=default

2011-08-28 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 28/08/2011 15:17, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Package: libv8 Version: 3.4.14.13-2 Severity: important Tags: experimental patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm preparing chromium 14 for experimental, and it FTFBS with this: LINK(target) out/Release/chrome

Bug#639596: Please compile with visibility=default

2011-08-28 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
On 08/28/2011 03:31 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: Shouldn't the solution be to move v8::internal::I18NExtension::get() to v8 (not internal) namespace ? Yes, but I suspect there are a lot of v8::internal() needed by chromium. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature