Bug#642291: FTBFS on powerpc: misc/seq-long-double test fails, should be skipped

2011-09-22 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2011-09-21 at 07:30 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:18:47AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: The test fails because it doesn't pass $CFLAGS to the compiler. The attached patch fixes this, so the test is skipped as expected. The point wasn't to skip the test, it was

Bug#642291: FTBFS on powerpc: misc/seq-long-double test fails, should be skipped

2011-09-22 Thread Michael Stone
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:58:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: The skip message contains 'this test runs only on systems with [...] long double != double', which isn't satisfied with -mlong-double-64, is it? See the output samples; the prior version worked fine at this boundary, the new

Bug#642291: FTBFS on powerpc: misc/seq-long-double test fails, should be skipped

2011-09-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
Package: coreutils Version: 8.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The test fails because it doesn't pass $CFLAGS to the compiler. The attached patch fixes this, so the test is skipped as expected. - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid

Bug#642291: FTBFS on powerpc: misc/seq-long-double test fails, should be skipped

2011-09-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
found 642291 8.13-2 notfound 642291 8.5-1 kthxbye On Mit, 2011-09-21 at 10:18 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: Package: coreutils Version: 8.5-1 Whoops sorry, got the version wrong. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast |

Bug#642291: FTBFS on powerpc: misc/seq-long-double test fails, should be skipped

2011-09-21 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:18:47AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: The test fails because it doesn't pass $CFLAGS to the compiler. The attached patch fixes this, so the test is skipped as expected. The point wasn't to skip the test, it was to fix the bug. :-) Unfortunately, the CFLAGS change