>> BTW, I suppose that you tried to do the right thing by removing +moreinfo,
>> but for aptitude I sometimes use/misuse/abuse tags to mean something
>> slightly different, and set the packages apart from the big bunches.
>>
>
> I understand, but as a bug reporter, how am I supposed to know
>
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi,
2015-11-27 07:21 Harald Dunkel:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The examine window helps a lot to examine the conflict, of course,
but it can be improved. In your sample session
systemd will be upgraded from version 227-2 to version 228-2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Manuel,
On 12/01/15 22:35, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
> Changed, it will print from now on:
>
> The following packages depend on cpp-5 and will be broken by its removal:
>
> * cpp (upgraded, 4:5.2.1-6 -> 4:5.2.1-8) depends on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The examine window helps a lot to examine the conflict, of course,
but it can be improved. In your sample session
> systemd will be upgraded from version 227-2 to version 228-2.
>
> The following packages depend on version 227-2 of systemd, and
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Harald,
2011-09-25 06:54 Harald Dunkel:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.4-1
If there is a conflict on upgrade, then the bottom half
window shows something like
package-a depends on package-b (>= 1.23)
This
Any news about this problem? Can you reproduce this?
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.4-1
If there is a conflict on upgrade, then the bottom half
window shows something like
package-a depends on package-b (= 1.23)
This is of little help, cause you do not know whether its
the _old_ or the _new_
7 matches
Mail list logo
