On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:50:40PM -0300, rhatto wrote:
Em Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45:08PM +0200, intrigeri escreveu:
If the rsync handler is not in a good enough state on May 20th yet,
I'll release backupninja 1.0 *without* the rsync handler,
and upload it to Debian sid.
Seems fair and
Em Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:53:41AM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:50:40PM -0300, rhatto wrote:
Em Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45:08PM +0200, intrigeri escreveu:
If the rsync handler is not in a good enough state on May 20th yet,
I'll release backupninja 1.0
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:26:10AM -0300, rhatto wrote:
Em Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:53:41AM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
I actually disagree with #3929 though, now I think of it. The date of
the daily/weekly/monthly dirs is valueable, otherwise there is now way
to tell when the backup
Em Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:27:28PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:26:10AM -0300, rhatto wrote:
Em Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:53:41AM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
I actually disagree with #3929 though, now I think of it. The date of
the daily/weekly/monthly
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:20:25PM -0300, rhatto wrote:
If I understood correctly given the info above, weekly.1/ folder dates from
Feb 27 01:11 but metadata/weekly.1/rotated says it was rotated at Thu 12
Apr
2012 01:04:38 CEST.
What really counts is the date from the metadata file as the
Hi,
backupninja upstream and Debian maintainer hat on:
I trust you to find a good long-term solution,
but the backupninja 1.0 release is currently blocked
by the remaining critical bugs in the rsync handler,
and the Wheezy freeze is coming *soon*,
so I now need to set a clear deadline:
If the
Em Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45:08PM +0200, intrigeri escreveu:
backupninja upstream and Debian maintainer hat on:
I trust you to find a good long-term solution,
but the backupninja 1.0 release is currently blocked
by the remaining critical bugs in the rsync handler,
and the Wheezy freeze is
Em Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:13:23PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:01:45PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
I can confirm that after applying the patch, backups seem to be running
again (first run with patch was Apr 7 00:36):
# ls -l
total 40
Hello all,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:01:45PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
I can confirm that after applying the patch, backups seem to be running
again (first run with patch was Apr 7 00:36):
# ls -l
total 40
drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 4096 Apr 9 01:12 daily.1/
drwxr-xr-x 19 root
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:56:58AM -0300, rhatto wrote:
Em Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
I meant this differently. It just seems that if you make an error, e.g.
you set:
rsync_options = --non-existing-bla --syntax-error-coming up
and rsync
Em Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:54:55PM -0300, rhatto wrote:
Em Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:01:45PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
What it IMO doesn't solve, is the fact that the handler gave a syntax
error and probably
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:54:55PM -0300, rhatto wrote:
Em Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:01:45PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
What it IMO doesn't solve, is the fact that the handler gave a syntax
error and probably returned and error code, but backupninja intepreted
this as backup succesful.
Em Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:01:45PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg escreveu:
What it IMO doesn't solve, is the fact that the handler gave a syntax
error and probably returned and error code, but backupninja intepreted
this as backup succesful. This worries me a bit.
I think that the only way to avoid
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 05:34:09PM -0300, rhatto wrote:
Em Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:37:37AM +0200, intrigeri escreveu:
Please fix ASAP so we can release 1.0 :)
This is top priority for me. :)
I opened https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/3868 to deal with this
new issue.
Paul, the
tags 654192 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Paul van Tilburg wrote (26 Mar 2012 05:53:29 GMT) :
Yes, it works fine now!
Thank you for your help debugging this!
I merged rhatto's debian/654192 branch into upstream master.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @
Hey all,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:41:46AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
intrigeri wrote (03 Mar 2012 10:57:27 GMT) :
Paul van Tilburg wrote (28 Feb 2012 09:20:45 GMT) :
Ok, I have unpatched and repatched with what you sent. Tonight the
rsync backups already ran with the patch applied that you
Hi Paul,
intrigeri wrote (03 Mar 2012 10:57:27 GMT) :
Paul van Tilburg wrote (28 Feb 2012 09:20:45 GMT) :
Ok, I have unpatched and repatched with what you sent. Tonight the
rsync backups already ran with the patch applied that you sent
yesterday; it was the first run I had without warnings!
17 matches
Mail list logo
