On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:56:19PM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:41:05 +0100
Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:32:34AM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
Failing that, should I just use the submitted patch to cure this
issue?
I've
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:34:23 +0200
Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:56:19PM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:41:05 +0100
Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
freeciv-server:
Position Independent Executable: no, normal executable!
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:41:05 +0100
Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:32:34AM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
[ I've documented the changes for releases older then squeeze and
added in relevant dependencies, so dropping the oldstable bit from the
discussion ]
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:41:05 +0100
Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:32:34AM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
Failing that, should I just use the submitted patch to cure this
issue?
I've described the backport-friendly hardening way in
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:32:34AM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
Package: freeciv
Severity: normal
Hi both,
If we are willing to drop trivial backporting to oldstable, could we use
`dpkg-buildflags --export=configure` to cut out all the manual setting
and exporting of the hardening variables?
Package: freeciv
Severity: normal
Hi both,
If we are willing to drop trivial backporting to oldstable, could we use
`dpkg-buildflags --export=configure` to cut out all the manual setting
and exporting of the hardening variables?
Problem with that method would be on the Ubuntu side - they don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
