Am 24.01.2012 16:22, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Please also note that just removing -fPIC from the makefiles will lead
to compilation failures on i386 because of register shortage. You would
then to additionally need to pass --disable-optimizations to the
configure script. And now things will
Am 23.01.2012 14:53, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
The reason is that x264 uses a lot of hand written assembler, and
upstream takes care to use non-pic code only on architectures that
support this.
Btw, the same applies to the libav* packages.
Is there any benchmark available (for either package)
On Di, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:04:00 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 23.01.2012 14:53, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
The reason is that x264 uses a lot of hand written assembler, and
upstream takes care to use non-pic code only on architectures that
support this.
Btw, the same applies to the
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:11, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
On Di, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:04:00 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 23.01.2012 14:53, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
The reason is that x264 uses a lot of hand written assembler, and
upstream takes care to use non-pic code
On Di, Jan 24, 2012 at 16:09:01 (CET), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:11, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
On Di, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:04:00 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 23.01.2012 14:53, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
The reason is that x264 uses a lot of hand
Package: x264
Version: 2:0.116.2042+git178455c-1
Severity: wishlist
Bug forwarded from https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919509
Seems that according to Policy ยง10.2, we need to document why we are not
building the shared library with -fPIC in the file README.Debian and get
consensus on that on the
6 matches
Mail list logo
