On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 23:39 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2012/5/1 Simon McVittie s...@debian.org:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 at 12:47:43 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Quakespasm has never been present on either of the affected architectures,
so there's certainly no regression here
That's why it's
2012/5/1 Simon McVittie s...@debian.org:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 at 12:47:43 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
NMU to fix this has been uploaded to DELAYED/10. Debdiff is attached.
With that in mind, I don't think this is an appropriate use of an NMU.
It is. But since the issue is being worked on,
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 at 10:08:20 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
severity 657793 important
Please do not exaggerate bug severities.
I can *just about* see how running a Quake dedicated server on the FreeBSD
kernel might be a rational thing to do, if you're really, really keen on
FreeBSD's
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 10:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 at 10:08:20 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
severity 657793 important
Please do not exaggerate bug severities.
I do not exaggerate the bug severity: FTBFS with a patch has this
importance level.
Running the client
Forwarded Message
From: Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com
Reply-to: svante.sign...@telia.com
To: Simon McVittie s...@debian.org
Cc: 657...@bugs.debian.org, Robert Millan r...@debian.org, Steven
Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org
Subject: Re: Bug#657793: quakespasm: FTBFS
On 01/05/12 10:12, Simon McVittie wrote:
I can *just about* see how running a Quake dedicated server on the FreeBSD
kernel might be a rational thing to do, if you're really, really keen on
FreeBSD's firewalling...
Hi!
You seem skeptical...
Arguably it could also have better security/uptime,
I have confirmed the patched version builds and runs succesfully on
kfreebsd amd64 sid. I was only able to use vesa mode as I have an
nvidia card, so I wasn't able to get any reasonable speed at high
resolutions. The game plays nicely at 320x200 however ;) I confirmed
that you can play on a LAN
Package: src:quakespasm
Version: 0.85.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi!
For your package to build on kfreebsd arches, a small change seems to be
needed. Please see my attached patch.
Log of build
severity 657793 normal
thanks
On 28/01/12 21:31, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Severity: serious
As far as I can tell, it's never built successfully on kFreeBSD (it
failed differently before), so downgrading this.
For your package to build on kfreebsd arches, a small change seems to be
needed.
Hi,
On 28/01/12 22:12, Simon McVittie wrote:
severity 657793 normal
As far as I can tell, it's never built successfully on kFreeBSD (it
failed differently before), so downgrading this.
Oh. I was under the impression that a build failure on kfreebsd is an
RC bug for Wheezy, although I can't
10 matches
Mail list logo
