Bug#657828: ibus: FTBFS

2012-01-30 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Alioth may be down so I am sending mail directly. On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:53:57PM +0900, Daiki Ueno wrote: Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes: ... Googling lead me to a similar bug report elsewhere. Basically it changes above mentioned part with ==

Bug#657828: ibus: FTBFS

2012-01-30 Thread Aron Xu
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 22:31, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Alioth may be down so I am sending mail directly. Yes, vasks is down again since yesterday. Also, We use old automake1.11 (1:1.11.2-1) package based on 2011-12-21 Stable release 1.11.2.  Should we poke automake

Bug#657828: ibus: FTBFS

2012-01-30 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:48:10PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 22:31, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Alioth may be down so I am sending mail directly. Yes, vasks is down again since yesterday. Also, We use old automake1.11 (1:1.11.2-1) package based on

Bug#657828: ibus: FTBFS

2012-01-29 Thread Osamu Aoki
Package: ibus Version: 1.4.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Now ibus source is FTBFS at install. == ... dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building ibus using existing ./ibus_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source:

Bug#657828: Bug #657828: ibus: FTBFS

2012-01-29 Thread Aron Xu
tags 657828 + patch thanks Hi Osamu, I believe the patch you have proposed is the correct approach to fix this FTBFS. But it's better to change the name of the variable, because these two sample lines was taken from the ldm (not lightdm) project. The following patch should done the work, and

Bug#657828: ibus: FTBFS

2012-01-29 Thread Daiki Ueno
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes: Daiki, you pointed me to: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/automake.git/commit/?id=4e4dae50 I also found related follow-up http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2012-01/msg4.html I guess this is the cause of this new FTBFS phenomema. But I