Bug#660034: transition: libvpx

2012-02-19 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
On 17/02/2012 00:11, Cyril Brulebois wrote: chromium has #660159 so the binNMUs were useless. I've just pinged ftpmasters so that libvpx gets decrufted (ie. libvpx0 goes away). Baring chromium's uninstallability in sid, migration should happen. And libvpx0 will be kept in testing until

Bug#660034: transition: libvpx

2012-02-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (15/02/2012): I set up a tracker accordingly: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libvpx.html Since this interferes with x264, I'm taking the liberty of 0-day NMUing it to fix #658453, so that packages involved in the x264 transition can migrate

Bug#660034: transition: libvpx

2012-02-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (16/02/2012): libvpx being built and installed everywhere, I've just scheduled binNMUs for the following packages: chromium-browser gst-plugins-bad0.10 icedove sludge. chromium has #660159 so the binNMUs were useless. I've just pinged ftpmasters so that libvpx

Bug#660034: transition: libvpx

2012-02-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: pending User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, this transition was started by the libvpx upload to unstable replacing libvpx0 with libvpx1, without any coordination AFAICT:

Bug#660034: transition: libvpx

2012-02-15 Thread Christian Marillat
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: pending User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, this transition was started by the libvpx upload to unstable replacing libvpx0 with libvpx1, without any coordination

Bug#660034: transition: libvpx

2012-02-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 08:22 +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: this transition was started by the libvpx upload to unstable replacing libvpx0 with libvpx1, without any coordination AFAICT: